Flow retention
A. Background
-
Retention of streamflow can enhance baseflow. Will that enhancement extend to water supply in the main stem?
-
A retaining structure slows and widens the stream flow behind it.
-
The retained water can infiltrate; it also can evaporate and be taken up by plant roots and transpired from leaves.
-
Infiltration is normal, and its amount depends on permeability of the underlying strata and time over the strata.
-
Higher infiltration may occur where water is slowed and widened than in the narrower portions of mountain streams.
-
Evaporation is a function of temperature and exposure to solar radiation and wind.
-
Transpiration depends on the pond's vegetation environment.
-
It is greater in a forest-and-shrub than a grass landscape due to greater water uptake and leaf surface area.
-
That surface area, the canopy, however, may block solar radiation and lower water loss from evaporation.
-
Can water retention increase habitat resilience at streams without compromising water supply in the main stem?
Retention at Barlow, 1.3 mi upstream from outfall
B. Potential value
-
The infiltrated water will be cooled and can enhance recharge to stream baseflow.
-
Streams may be attractive for protection as habitat because they have enhanced baseflow from upstream ponds...
-
For example, as from a man-made impoundment at Barlow and beaver dams at Stoner, Scotch, and Roaring Forks.
-
Or have favorable locations where ponding can be established, such as with installation of a beaver dam analog.
-
Besides an intact dam at Scotch, just upstream is a flood plain with washed-out structures that could be renovated.