Instream flow program
A. Background
-
The Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) administers the state's Instream Flow Program.
-
The Colorado General Assembly authorized CWCB to acquire water rights for instream flows.
-
CWCB protects through "preservation of the natural environment to a reasonable degree" [1, 2].
-
Its approach is to ensure minimum flows.
-
Streams enrolled in the Instream Flow Program are shown in the map below.
B. Program features
-
Distinctive is that with CWCB's rights, water stays in the stream channel.
-
This is in comparison with consumptive use, for example, water removed for irrigation.
-
Prior-established water rights prevail, however, meaning that CWCB's rights may be junior.
-
CWCB may acquire rights, however, and, thereby, rise in seniority.
-
Acquisition can be by "purchase, bequest, donation,...lease, exchange or other contractual agreement" [1].
-
It cannot be by eminent domain or force [1].
-
Also, CWCB can accept the temporary loan of water rights under the existing rule [1].
-
Proposed changes would extend the loan duration [3].
-
That is, loans could be made during 5 years, not just 3 years, over a 10-year period.
-
And loans could be renewed for up to 2 more 10-year periods.
-
Trout Unlimited has expressed support for the proposed changes [4].
C. Enrolled
-
Eighteen of the study's 42 streams participate in the Instream Flow Program. (See Protections underway.)
-
The red lines in map 1 above show the streams having that protection [5].
-
Nine of those 18 have no surface water diversion structures.
-
Two have 1 surface water diversion structure each on private property: Bear and Roaring Forks.
-
They are shown below in map 2 with pink squares.
-
The remaining 6 have more than 2 surface water diversions, on private property.
-
For example, there are 7 authorized surface water diversions at Fish and Little Fish, a tributary of Fish [5].
-
For comparison, Stoner, which is not part of the Instream Flow Program, has 4 diversions [5].
-
There is very little non-federal land, that is, privately property, at higher elevations in the study area.
-
The result is very little water diversion; for example, none above Marguerite, as seen above in map 1.
-
Private properties at lower elevations at the main stem and the West Fork have multiple diversions.
-
This is seen below in map 2; private property is shown below in gray in maps 3 and 4.
References